Remove (OLED) from "Pure dark (OLED)"

[ghost]

Since you don't need an OLED display to use it. Maybe call it pure black instead of pure dark too.

[Acclorite]

I don't see issues with current naming and "(OLED)" part is just a bit more clearer indicator of darker theme. As for "pure black", the app has "dark" theme, not "black" theme, so why name it "pure black" and not "pure dark"?

[ghost]

I don't see issues with current naming and "(OLED)" part is just a bit more clearer indicator of darker theme. As for "pure black", the app has "dark" theme, not "black" theme, so why name it "pure black" and not "pure dark"?

OLED (organic light-emitting diode) is a screen technology, not a theme. OLED in itself does not mean "dark". The battery savings of a pure black dark theme compared to a gray dark theme are very small: https://www.xda-developers.com/amoled-black-vs-gray-dark-mode. "Pure dark" should be self-explanatory enough.

[ghost]

I don't see issues with current naming and "(OLED)" part is just a bit more clearer indicator of darker theme. As for "pure black", the app has "dark" theme, not "black" theme, so why name it "pure black" and not "pure dark"?

Also, how is "(OLED)" a clearer indicator of a darker theme?

[Acclorite]

Also, how is "(OLED)" a clearer indicator of a darker theme?

Because some users expect "OLED" to mean "dark". Look at most apps, "OLED" mode usually means completely black theme. By definition? It is not.

OLED (organic light-emitting diode) is a screen technology, not a theme.

No, but this screen technology's ability to completely turn off pixels, emitting no light, explains why "OLED" is used in the naming.

OLED in itself does not mean "dark"

Not in itself, but it can be "dark".

The battery savings of a pure black dark theme compared to a gray dark theme are very small

It doesn't change the fact of me getting request to implement 0x000000 (black) theme (#64).

If I remove "OLED" or this theme completely I will just get another feature request for it. If user is happy with this theme, why remove or change its naming?

[ghost]

Because a theme is associated with something mostly unrelated? That should be avoided. I don't think many people will mind. Many mainstream apps with pure black themes have the theme just called "black", "pure black" or something similar and they probably don't have anyone complaining about the darker dark mode not mentioning some screen technology (or at least not many people).

What if someone thinks "OLED" means they need an OLED display to turn on the option?

[Acclorite]

Because a theme is associated with something mostly unrelated? That should be avoided. I don't think many people will mind. Many mainstream apps with pure black themes have the theme just called "black", "pure black" or something similar and they probably don't have anyone complaining about the darker dark mode not mentioning some screen technology.

You are a user, if it really irritates you then sure, I will remove that. At least until someone creates an issue to return it.

[ghost]

Because a theme is associated with something mostly unrelated? That should be avoided. I don't think many people will mind. Many mainstream apps with pure black themes have the theme just called "black", "pure black" or something similar and they probably don't have anyone complaining about the darker dark mode not mentioning some screen technology.

You are a user, if it really irritates you then sure, I will remove that. At least until someone creates an issue to return it.

Thanks!
Lets just hope no one creates an issue about it, right? :)

[irbox]

Title: Unified Dark theme option and/or Refactor "Pure Dark (OLED)" section into a Battery Saver mode

Description:

Current Problem:

The "Pure Dark (OLED)" Segmented buttons section feels redundant and separate from the main Dark theme configuration. This separation adds visual clutter and breaks UX consistency.

Proposed Changes:

1. Remove the separate "Pure Dark (OLED)" segmented button section.
2. Integrate a "Black" option into the existing Dark theme Segmented buttons section (above the "App theme" section).
3. Alternative approach (optional but recommended):
   • Repurpose the current "Pure Dark (OLED)" section into a "Battery Saver Mode" section.
   • Include options: Enable, Disable, and Auto/System.
   • This mode would do more than switch to black—it would also disable power-intensive features/processes within the app.
   • This is particularly beneficial for users in regions with frequent power outages or limited access to charging.

Justification:

• Improves UX by reducing fragmentation in theme settings.
• Makes better use of existing UI space and reduces cognitive load.
• Battery Saver Mode adds meaningful functionality for power-conscious users and aligns with accessibility and sustainability goals.

[irbox]

I saw this issue in "In progress" section in the Project tab, so I just added my suggestion here, instead of creating a new issue. I hope it helps.

[Acclorite]

Integrate a "Black" option into the existing Dark theme Segmented buttons section (above the "App theme" section).

What if user has it set to "System", how to define if it should be "black" or "dark"?

Repurpose the current "Pure Dark (OLED)" section into a "Battery Saver Mode" section.

"Pure dark" is not a "power saver" theme but black theme. "Saver" is just one of it's options. I personally use it because I like it, not to save battery or increase performance.

This mode would do more than switch to black—it would also disable power-intensive features/processes within the app.

I would not like to use a theme only without animations. Why not make "Battery saver mode" a separate option to only disable power-intensive features, so users can use whatever theme they like while also keeping animations off (it would also help those with old devices)?