You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, Brane has painfully low test coverage. This introduces quite a bit of risk when working on establish parts of Brane.
We should really find some sort of testing strategy for Brane so that we can be confident that the alterations we are making are correct.
As a stopgap measure, I suggest we start implementing Cargo insta in some crates so that we at least know when stuff changes
Testing parts that interface with the machine would require some nasty mocking right now so that is not even the focus in my opinion, but for crates like brane-dsl there is no reason not to test I think
Currently, Brane has painfully low test coverage. This introduces quite a bit of risk when working on establish parts of Brane.
We should really find some sort of testing strategy for Brane so that we can be confident that the alterations we are making are correct.
As a stopgap measure, I suggest we start implementing
Cargo insta
in some crates so that we at least know when stuff changesTesting parts that interface with the machine would require some nasty mocking right now so that is not even the focus in my opinion, but for crates like
brane-dsl
there is no reason not to test I thinkTo Do:
@Lut99 What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: