Skip to content

__write_overflow_field in drivers/crypto/marvell/cesa/cipher.c #1858

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
nickdesaulniers opened this issue May 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
[ARCH] arm32 This bug impacts ARCH=arm [BUG] linux-next This is an issue only seen in linux-next [CONFIG] allyesconfig Issue affects allyesconfig on certain architectures [FIXED][LINUX] development cycle This bug was only present and fixed in a -next or -rc cycle

Comments

@nickdesaulniers
Copy link
Member

In file included from drivers/crypto/marvell/cesa/cipher.c:12:
In file included from ./include/crypto/aes.h:10:
In file included from ./include/linux/crypto.h:15:
In file included from ./include/linux/completion.h:12:
In file included from ./include/linux/swait.h:7:
In file included from ./include/linux/spinlock.h:63:
In file included from ./include/linux/lockdep.h:14:
In file included from ./include/linux/smp.h:13:
In file included from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:12:
In file included from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:11:
In file included from ./include/linux/string.h:254:
./include/linux/fortify-string.h:583:4: error: call to '__write_overflow_field' declared with 'warning' attribute: detected write beyond size of field (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Werror,-Wattribute-warning]
                        __write_overflow_field(p_size_field, size);
                        ^
@nickdesaulniers nickdesaulniers added [BUG] Untriaged Something isn't working [ARCH] arm32 This bug impacts ARCH=arm [BUG] linux-next This is an issue only seen in linux-next [CONFIG] allyesconfig Issue affects allyesconfig on certain architectures labels May 30, 2023
@nathanchance
Copy link
Member

@nathanchance nathanchance added [PATCH] Accepted A submitted patch has been accepted upstream and removed [BUG] Untriaged Something isn't working labels May 30, 2023
@nathanchance
Copy link
Member

@nathanchance nathanchance added [FIXED][LINUX] development cycle This bug was only present and fixed in a -next or -rc cycle and removed [PATCH] Accepted A submitted patch has been accepted upstream labels Jun 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[ARCH] arm32 This bug impacts ARCH=arm [BUG] linux-next This is an issue only seen in linux-next [CONFIG] allyesconfig Issue affects allyesconfig on certain architectures [FIXED][LINUX] development cycle This bug was only present and fixed in a -next or -rc cycle
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants