Skip to content

WGS watchmaker - clarify manual from automated #602

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
ceciliamattssonscilifelab opened this issue Mar 6, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

WGS watchmaker - clarify manual from automated #602

ceciliamattssonscilifelab opened this issue Mar 6, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@ceciliamattssonscilifelab

Lims Issue

Work Flow: WGS
Protocol: Pre Processing WGS v1
Step: Buffer Exchange WGS v1

Description: It needs to be clear in LIMS if the buffer exchange was done manully or using Hamilton, since this information is used for trending and troubleshooting. Today it is possible to add the name of the Instrument but not adding Equipment document and the other way around.

Image Image

Work Flow: WGS
**Protocol:**Library validation QC WGS v1
**Step:**qPCR QC (Library Validation) WGS v1
Description:

Same as above

@idalindegaard
Copy link
Contributor

Good point Cissi, we have discussed this and realised we could actually add "Manual" as an option for the method name. We could implement this for many steps, I made a new issue that would take care of more steps where the same thing applies here

@idalindegaard
Copy link
Contributor

"Manual" added as option in this specific step for udf "Equipment Document"

@ceciliamattssonscilifelab
Copy link
Author

Reopening this issue, since it would be good to improve and make it more clear in LIMS if the buffer exchange was done manully or using Hamilton.

Today, it is possible to add "Manual", but also to add a robot name (Laura/Leslie). Could this be changed to that it is not possible to do this mistake?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants