Skip to content

Import uses configuration template 'default' by default. #5

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
blackappsolutions opened this issue May 26, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Comments

@blackappsolutions
Copy link

Please provide a way to select the import-template as it is done in the export (https://github.com/CoreMedia/csv-reporting/blob/master/csv-studio/src/main/joo/com/coremedia/csv/studio/CSVExportDialog.mxml#L39) to synchronize both oprations.

@blackappsolutions
Copy link
Author

blackappsolutions commented May 26, 2021

Implemented poor-mans template-choosing for imports 7b3ace5
See #4

@kmcherni
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Markus,

Yes - the original idea behind the templates was to have this functionality to define the custom names of your columns headers for both import & export. Although this part of the functionality fell out of scope of the initial implementation - this feature is still planned for future development.

While the import does use the default template mapping between column headers and properties - the export template feature still has its uses as you can define which columns you wish to report on. The importer will still ingest the report even if there are missing columns - with the exception of Content ID and Content Type - to ensure data integrity.

Please let us know if you have any further questions or concerns!

Thanks,
Kevin

@blackappsolutions
Copy link
Author

Hi Kevin,

so what do you think of my solution? See #4

@blackappsolutions
Copy link
Author

blackappsolutions commented May 28, 2021

It is not so good as having a combo box, as it is a global setting, but better as nothing.

Do you see the chance implementing the combo box for imports?

@blackappsolutions
Copy link
Author

We found a solution

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants