Skip to content

Could you share the evaluate code? #6

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Matcha-Liu opened this issue Feb 24, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Could you share the evaluate code? #6

Matcha-Liu opened this issue Feb 24, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@Matcha-Liu
Copy link

In the code repository there is only the test code that shows the reasoning process, could you share the evaluate code to get an accuracy on a whole dataset ?

@ZhaochenYu0201
Copy link
Member

Thanks for your concern. The current version of ReasonFlux is our demo version, showing the inference process and including the SFT stage training script. The test code aims to demonstrate the inference logic. We plan to release the full evaluation code (for full dataset accuracy) with the RL stage training code later.
For now, you can try existing open-source evaluation libraries like lm-evaluation-harness and Evalchemy, to evaluate the model. Please stay tuned for our future updates.

@YangLing0818
Copy link
Member

In the code repository there is only the test code that shows the reasoning process, could you share the evaluate code to get an accuracy on a whole dataset ?

We have updated a new model with its evaluation code, please check.

@Matcha-Liu
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your contribution!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants