Skip to content

fix(jans-scim): improper handling response of get user operation #2420

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 20, 2022
Merged

fix(jans-scim): improper handling response of get user operation #2420

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 20, 2022

Conversation

jgomer2001
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #2395

@mo-auto mo-auto added area-CI Issue or changes required in automatic builds or CI infrastructure comp-jans-scim Component affected by issue or PR kind-bug Issue or PR is a bug in existing functionality labels Sep 19, 2022
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

[SCIM API] Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

0.0% 0.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@jgomer2001 jgomer2001 requested a review from yuriyz September 19, 2022 21:07
@yuriyz yuriyz merged commit b9e00af into main Sep 20, 2022
@yuriyz yuriyz deleted the jans-scim-issue_2395 branch September 20, 2022 04:44
This was referenced Nov 1, 2022
Merged
Merged
@mo-auto3 mo-auto3 mentioned this pull request Nov 1, 2022
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@yuriyz yuriyz yuriyz approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area-CI Issue or changes required in automatic builds or CI infrastructure comp-jans-scim Component affected by issue or PR kind-bug Issue or PR is a bug in existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

fix(jans-scim): improper handling response of get user operation
3 participants
@jgomer2001 @yuriyz @mo-auto