Skip to content

Baseline results without Self-Explaining #12

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Munzu opened this issue Jun 3, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Baseline results without Self-Explaining #12

Munzu opened this issue Jun 3, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@Munzu
Copy link

Munzu commented Jun 3, 2022

In your paper, you reported the following results on SST-5 for RoBERTa without Self-Explaining as a baseline:

Model Accuracy
RoBERTa-base 56.4%
RoBERTa-large 57.9%

The original paper by Liu et al. (2019b) does not list any results for SST-5, so I'm assuming you obtained these results yourself.
Could you share how you did that?
Did you fine-tune these baselines on the SST-5 dataset, or are these the performances right out of the box?
Many thanks in advance.

@ZeqiangWangAI
Copy link

I have faced the same problem. I use the huggingface official script to finetune Roberta-base. However, I can hardly achieve such results. Have you reproduced the baseline and would you mind sharing the configuration?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants