Skip to content

Reseach if we can eliminate the local-path-provisioner limitation that PV cannot be attached after rolling update #307

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
ialidzhikov opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
area/testing Testing related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.

Comments

@ialidzhikov
Copy link
Member

ialidzhikov commented Dec 16, 2024

How to categorize this issue?

/area testing
/kind enhancement

What would you like to be added:
See

// PersistentVolumeClaims in local setup are provisioned by local-path-provisioner. local-path-provisioner creates a hostPath based persistent volume
// on the Node. The provisioned PV is tightly bound to the Node. When the Node is deleted, the PV's hostPath directory is also deleted.
// local-path-provisioner does not support moving PVC from one Node to another one (see https://github.com/rancher/local-path-provisioner/issues/31#issuecomment-690772828).
// A local-path-provisioner PVC cannot deal with Node deletion/rollout.
.

Right now, we have TM tests for scenarios that include Node rolling update because we cannot test the scenario in e2e test because of the above limitation. It would be great if we can eliminate this limitation so that we replace the TM tests with the e2e alternatives.

Some ideas:

  • Use in-place update for as strategy for rolling the Shoot Nodes. Not yet available, still in development at the time of writing this issue.
    • Help to tackle the issue for the CA rotation test but not for the hibernation test
  • Use S3-compatible storage like min.io which is deployed in the Shoot control plane.
  • Other ideas?

Why is this needed:
Replace TM tests with e2e ones.

@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot added area/testing Testing related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension labels Dec 16, 2024
@gardener-ci-robot
Copy link

The Gardener project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close

/lifecycle stale

@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 19, 2025
@ialidzhikov
Copy link
Member Author

/remove-lifecycle stale

@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 28, 2025
@ialidzhikov
Copy link
Member Author

/lifecycle frozen

@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot added the lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Mar 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/testing Testing related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants