Skip to content

Can't edit ballots for RFCs that are advancing in place #667

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
ietf-svn-bot opened this issue May 19, 2011 · 6 comments
Closed

Can't edit ballots for RFCs that are advancing in place #667

ietf-svn-bot opened this issue May 19, 2011 · 6 comments

Comments

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link

resolution_overtaken by events type_defect | by [email protected]


The tracker currently doesn't allow ballots issues against RFCs (for standards ladder advancement without revision) to be edited.

The Edit Position button on the IESG Evaluation tab of the main document view takes you to the ballot for the draft, not the ballot for the RFC.

The Edit Position button on the popup form you get when left clicking the position grid wherever it is displayed (same as right-clicking that position grid) takes you to a url that 404's
Example: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5590/edit/position/

For now, the IESG is working around this using the old tracker.

Related - the model (I think) assumes that there will only be zero or one ballots for an RFC. Until we change from the 3 tier model, there can be two.


Issue migrated from trac:667 at 2022-03-04 01:50:10 +0000

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@[email protected] commented


The related model bug is bug #668

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@[email protected] commented


Some progress on this at
URL: https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb/personal/rjs/retreat
Revision: 3107

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

ietf-svn-bot commented May 21, 2011

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@[email protected] changed status from new to closed

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@[email protected] changed resolution from `` to overtaken by events

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@[email protected] commented


This will be addressed using the post-redesign schema. See ticket #803

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant