You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Jens I guess you found a bug. The 2.5 does not make sense at all. I think it was in to test the sensitivity and never taken out.
We have no the problem that the change in the source code would require a change in all our calibrations or at least putting a
factor in for all calibration for the calibration parameter manningsN
The calibration parameter manningsN compensates somehow for the 2.5 factor.
I guess we will remove the 2.5 in the following releases. But till then we leave it in.
channelAlpha is multiplied by 2.5 here, but it is not clear (to me ;-)), why this is done.
CWatM/cwatm/hydrological_modules/routing_reservoirs/routing_kinematic.py
Line 276 in 31ed493
It seems different from the CWatM paper (eq.21) : https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/13/3267/2020/
And also different from the PCR-GLOBWB implementation
https://github.com/UU-Hydro/PCR-GLOBWB_model/blob/2e3a5d85b0a1c264c7cb22dbc864bce87d115053/model/routing.py#L1243
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: