Promote TL;DR as canonical intro.

Move fancier falsehood article description to contribution guide. Refs #105

Author: kdeldycke

.github/contributing.md

@@ -12,31 +12,32 @@ in this awesome list.
 
 ### Falsehood Articles
 
-Articles following the *falsehood* scheme are prime candidates for inclusion in
+Articles following the *falsehood* schema are prime candidates for inclusion in
 this awesome list.
 
-These articles starts with the hypothesis that developers have a naive, simple
-view of the subject at hand. Then proceed to list a set of candid assumptions
-that might be held by the programmers. Each one is intentionally false, and
-in their best form illustrated by a counter-example.
+These articles starts with the hypothesis that developers have a naive and
+simple view of a domain. Then proceed to list a set of candid assumptions that
+might be held by programmers. Each one is intentionally false, and in their
+best form are illustrated with a counter-example.
 
 A list of falsehood is crafted as a progression that is designed to refine
 concepts. Having read the whole list of falsehood, the reader should possess a
-global, if not complete, overview of the domain being targeted by the article,
-including most, if not all, its pitfalls, edges-cases and inconsistencies.
+better overview of a domain while dispelling its myths, point out common
+pitfalls and demonstrate its subtleties.
 
-Sometimes, these kind of articles might provoke an emotional reaction and cause
-flipping table. `(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻` Because, the world is messy. Discovering the
-complexity of a domain that is simple in appearance will lead to
-frustrations. This is the sign of a great candidate for that list!
+*falsehood* articles are, in a sense, a suite of wordy unit-tests covering
+extensive edge-cases provided by real-world usage. The world is messy.
+Discovering a domain to be much more complex than anticipated will lead to
+frustrations. And cause flipping tables `(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻`. This is the sign of a
+great candidate for that list!
 
 Articles featuring items that are applicable to one product (or a service) and
 one only can't be considered as generic enough and should be avoided.
 
 ### Libraries
 
 Programming libraries or modules are good candidates too, if they solve or
-reduce the complexities pointed to by the *falsehood* articles above.
+reduce the complexities pointed to by *falsehood* articles above.
 
 That way we can put back tables in place. `┬─┬ ノ( ゜-゜ノ)`
 

readme.md

@@ -13,21 +13,11 @@
   — Ludwig Wittgenstein<sup id="intro-quote-ref"><a href="#intro-quote-def">[1]</a></sup>
 </p>
 
-*Falsehood* articles are a form of commentary on a particular subject, and are appreciated by the developer community at large for their effectiveness and terseness. They're a convenient written form to approach an unfamiliar domain by dispelling myths, point out common pitfalls, show inconsistencies and subtleties.
-
-In a sense, *Falsehood* articles are a suite of wordy unit-tests covering extensive edge-cases provided by real-world usage.
-
-<details>
-  <summary> 
-    <strong>TL;DR version</strong> <sub>(Click To Expand)</sub>
-  </summary>
-  
-  > A "falsehood" is an **"idea" that you initially believe was true**, but in-reality it is **proven to be false**. 
-  > 
-  > E.g. "**Idea:** Valid email address exactly has one `@` character, right? I will use this rule to implement my email-field validation logic. **Reality:** False! Emails [can have multiple `@` chars](#emails), therefore my implementation should allow this.". 
-  > 
-  > These listed articles will have a comprehensive list of those false-beliefs that you should be aware of, to help you become a better programmer.
-</details>
+A *falsehood* is an ***idea* that you initially believe was true**, but in-reality it is **proven to be false**.
+
+E.g. of an *idea*: valid email address exactly has one `@` character. So, you will use this rule to implement your email-field validation logic. Right? Wrong! The *reality* is: emails [can have multiple `@` chars](#emails). Therefore youy implementation should allow this. The initial *idea* is the a falsehood you believed in.
+
+The *falsehood* articles listed below will have a comprehensive list of those false-beliefs that you should be aware of, to help you become a better programmer.
 
 ## Contents