Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

didSave without didOpen #2110

Open
HolonProduction opened this issue Feb 28, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

didSave without didOpen #2110

HolonProduction opened this issue Feb 28, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@HolonProduction
Copy link

In #1220 it has been clarified, that didChange requires a client to take ownership with didOpen. However it was never answered, whether the same applies to didSave. Could this be clarified as well?

Also, if didSave can happen without didOpen how is it possible to obtain the TextDocumentItem to which the notification relates.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@HolonProduction