You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In particular, 'isDerivedFrom', 'isInstanceOf', and 'hasInstance' are in the Model Qualifiers list, but not the Biology Qualifiers list (aka bqmodel but not bqbiol). In addition, 'is' and 'isDescribedBy' are in both lists.
If people feel like these terms should be added to bqbiol in addition to bqmodel, that can probably be done, but in the meantime, it's probably best to put the only-in-bqmodel terms into the accepted namespace.
Please include a short description of problem here
https://github.com/opencobra/cobratoolbox/blob/37c922c422a19d731da66e81059ec0989db39418/src/base/io/utilities/SBML/getBioQualifiers.m
lists several qualifiers in a single list, but some of them come from different lists; see:
https://web.archive.org/web/20211204231945/http://co.mbine.org/specifications/qualifiers
In particular, 'isDerivedFrom', 'isInstanceOf', and 'hasInstance' are in the Model Qualifiers list, but not the Biology Qualifiers list (aka bqmodel but not bqbiol). In addition, 'is' and 'isDescribedBy' are in both lists.
If people feel like these terms should be added to bqbiol in addition to bqmodel, that can probably be done, but in the meantime, it's probably best to put the only-in-bqmodel terms into the accepted namespace.
I hereby confirm that I have:
I looked at the source code and that was it. Issue from sbmlteam/libsbml#283 (cf @GwennyGit).
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: