You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Been using my own 2d aabb implementation for some time, just noticed cglm now provides a 3d aabb (two vec3's), would a 2d version of the aabb functions be welcome? questions:
How the functions should be named? glm_aabb2d_size()? glm_aabs_size() (axis-aligned bounding-square, this one kinda goofy)?
The name of the file? currently the aabb functions are located on box.h, should we create a aabb2d.h? square.h?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
would a 2d version of the aabb functions be welcome
Definitely, it would be nice to have 2d aabb :) aabb2d.h header and aabb2d namespace is fine. square.h would match box.h but in the future maybe we change box.h into aabb.h not sure but aabb2d.h can be used for now.
Been using my own 2d aabb implementation for some time, just noticed cglm now provides a 3d aabb (two vec3's), would a 2d version of the aabb functions be welcome? questions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: