Skip to content

README.md should specify the nightly version to use #2705

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
spease opened this issue Apr 29, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

README.md should specify the nightly version to use #2705

spease opened this issue Apr 29, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@spease
Copy link

spease commented Apr 29, 2018

Seems like every time I try to build clippy, it's broken with the current nightly. Probably because the instructions fetch from crates.io, and crates.io doesn't seem to be updated as frequently as it needs to be to keep pace with nightly.

Assuming the current release cadence remains constant, I'd start specifying the version of nightly that clippy needs, or remove the instructions altogether and recommend that people build from source as the only supported method. Rather than outlining a method that does not seem to work most of the time because the official version is usually behind nightly.

@jfuzaroa
Copy link

Yeah cargo +nightly install clippy seems to fail quite often. Hopefully they fix this issue.

@JoshLambda
Copy link

and recommend that people build from source

Not sure that would help since building from source is currently broken too (see #2704).

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Apr 29, 2018

You can still use cargo install, but you'd need to pass the address of this repo via the appropriate flag

@phansch
Copy link
Member

phansch commented Dec 11, 2018

Closing this as Clippy can now be installed via Rustup. If you still want to use Clippy on nightly, this website can be helpful: https://mexus.github.io/rustup-components-history/

@phansch phansch closed this as completed Dec 11, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants