Ability to specify fragment placement in templates

[simonw]

So you can construct a template that includes fragments at specific point within that template.

Suggested https://mastodon.social/@webology/114387919299723272

Where $1 might be the output from the first fragment, and $2 would be the output from the second fragment when given a template name.

I don't love that syntax, but maybe something more from python's format would be better. or even -f var_name=github:simonw/symbex and var_name is the template's variable to be replaced.

[jefftriplett]

I'm doing this as a manual step with Ned's wonderful cogapp project today and then eventually piping the results back into LLM.

I have blocks these using symbex:

<example-model>
# [[[cog
import subprocess
output = subprocess.check_output(["uvx", "symbex", "--exclude", ".stversions", "--no-file", "MyDjangoModel"], text=True)
print(output.strip())
# ]]]
# [[[end]]]
</example-model>

We could skip all of that though and use your fragment templates if there were an easier way to template them. Like maybe this:

Please read our example Django Model and Django ModelAdmin

<example-model>
{$1}
</example-model>

<example-model-admin>
{$2}
</example-model-admin>

Given this this Django model, please create a ModelAdmin for our model:

<model>
{$3}
</model>

<instructions>
- please read our example-model and example-model-admin for ideas
- use our `model` to create a new `model-admin`
- ... 
</instructions>

<model-admin>
...
</model-admin>