-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 678
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for Querydsl predicate binding on WebFlux [DATACMNS-1785] #2200
Comments
Any due date? |
Feel free to submit a pull request to speed up things. |
I noticed there's a |
On the other hand, is it necessary to have a custom @EnableSpringDataWebFluxSupport as mentioned in #1846 ? |
For now, we have very few utilities that could be registered through What you're looking for is a reactive variant of Pulling out the common bits of |
Should I change the name of the class from |
Yes, please. Let's continue the discussion regarding the code changes in #2274. |
Introduce constructors accepting non-null ConversionService, handle conversion service defaulting in configuration classes by using ObjectProvider. Extract common code to create a predicate in getPredicate(…) method. Add unit test. Convert spaces to tabs. Related ticket: #2200. Original pull request: #2274.
That's in place now. |
Oliver Drotbohm opened DATACMNS-1785 and commented
The binding of request parameters to a Querydsl
Predicate
is currently only supported for WebMVC. We're currently lacking integration with WebFlux parameter resolutionNo further details from DATACMNS-1785
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: