Skip to content

FAQ for the common bs #210

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
t3dotgg opened this issue Jul 18, 2022 · 8 comments · Fixed by #320
Closed

FAQ for the common bs #210

t3dotgg opened this issue Jul 18, 2022 · 8 comments · Fixed by #320
Labels
📚 documentation Improvements or additions to documentation 🌟 enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@t3dotgg
Copy link
Member

t3dotgg commented Jul 18, 2022

"why can't I run without a DB url?"
"what database can I use?"
"how do I add X to my next-auth session?"
"can I use vanilla JS?"

I think an FAQ is worth doing. Can work on it tomorrow if y'all agree

@nexxeln
Copy link
Member

nexxeln commented Jul 18, 2022

I agree.
I was also thinking that we should make the website a bit better, add the FAQ and the axioms there as well.

@bhatvikrant
Copy link
Contributor

Is anyone working on this?

@riolly
Copy link

riolly commented Aug 3, 2022

Here is my story using create-t3-app for the first time.
As junior dev.

I tried create-t3-app with next-auth, but never going through next-auth getting started guide before and expect everything just work.
So I try to implement the google auth provider and it's not working and ended up spending hours debugging.
Then I finally just follow the next-auth getting started & guide, try next-auth in isolation, and after that I can fix it in just a second.

So it will be good to encourage people to try each of the individual stack before using this.
So they can understand how everything is put together and can easily extend the configuration.

@t3dotgg
Copy link
Member Author

t3dotgg commented Aug 10, 2022

"Why are there JS files in the repo?"

@royanger
Copy link

I want to get a basic version of this going with the idea that its easy to add questions. Is the preference to have this as part of README or its own .md file?

@nexxeln
Copy link
Member

nexxeln commented Aug 15, 2022

We were going to make a page in the docs site for this. But yeah the README for the generated project is also good. What do you think @juliusmarminge?

@juliusmarminge
Copy link
Member

juliusmarminge commented Aug 15, 2022

We were going to make a page in the docs site for this. But yeah the README for the generated project is also good. What do you think @juliusmarminge?

I'd say link to a page on the upcoming docs(#300). We could also have a Awesome board there to solve #231, like tRPC.

@juliusmarminge
Copy link
Member

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
📚 documentation Improvements or additions to documentation 🌟 enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants