Skip to content

incompatible type for loop variables expressions but no error raised #5055

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
michaellilltokiwa opened this issue Apr 14, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working front end related to the front end until .fum file is created: call and type resolution, type checking, etc.

Comments

@michaellilltokiwa
Copy link
Member

first expression results in an option, second is atomic option but no error is raised:

n := head.read, n.val.next

@michaellilltokiwa michaellilltokiwa added bug Something isn't working front end related to the front end until .fum file is created: call and type resolution, type checking, etc. labels Apr 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working front end related to the front end until .fum file is created: call and type resolution, type checking, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant