Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

API with CompletableFuture/Stage instead of/addition to Future #86

Open
hheg opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

API with CompletableFuture/Stage instead of/addition to Future #86

hheg opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@hheg
Copy link

hheg commented Feb 25, 2020

Would it be possible to extend the current API with CompletableFuture/Stage and not just Future?
@lpld
Copy link

lpld commented Dec 18, 2020 •
edited
Loading

That would be awesome. What's the point in having an async library that still requires a blocking Future#get to obtain the result of every call?

@nvsnvikram
Copy link
Contributor

That is a nice suggestion. Can you please provide a PR? We can review and get that merged.

@chibenwa
Copy link
Contributor

Hello,

I need this too to get "true asynchronous" execution for running performance tests. See https://github.com/linagora/gatling-imap/

We might consider contributing this.

Regards

@chibenwa chibenwa mentioned this issue Mar 31, 2022
Closed
@chibenwa
Copy link
Contributor

CF #118 (the completablefuture of the poor) but that's enough for integration eg in Akka actor system.

@chibenwa
Copy link
Contributor

Following the merge of #118 , this can be closed, right?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@lpld @nvsnvikram @chibenwa @hheg