Skip to content

[Microsoft.StorageActions][StorageTasks] Address SDK team feedback #28718

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

golddove
Copy link
Member

@golddove golddove commented Apr 17, 2024

Fix spec to reflect actual service behavior (identity and properties are required). We are in Public Preview and this is the behavior customers have been experiencing, but the SDK team noticed we missed marking the property required in the swagger. Fixing the discrepancy - there is no new breaking change for customers using the service.

Description/sample updates

ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request

Tip

Overwhelmed by all this guidance? See the Getting help section at the bottom of this PR description.

Note

As of January 2024 there is no PR assignee. This is expected. See https://aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review.

PR review workflow diagram

Please understand this diagram before proceeding. It explains how to get your PR approved & merged.

diagram

Click here to see the details of Step 1, Breaking Changes review

If you are in purview of Step 1 of the diagram, follow the Breaking Changes review process.
IMPORTANT! This applies even if you believe your PR was mislabeled, for any reason, including tool failure.

Click here to see the details of Step 2, ARM review

See https://aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review.

Click here to see the diagram footnotes

Diagram footnotes

[1] See ARM review queue (for PR merge queues, see [2]).
[2] public repo merge queue, private repo merge queue (for ARM review queue, [1])
The ARM reviewer on-call engineer visits the merge queue twice a day, so the approximate ETA for merges is 12 - 24 hours.

Purpose of this PR

What's the purpose of this PR? Check the specific option that applies. This is mandatory!

  • New resource provider.
  • New API version for an existing resource provider. (If API spec is not defined in TypeSpec, the PR should have been generated using OpenAPI Hub).
  • Update existing version for a new feature. (This is applicable only when you are revising a private preview API version.)
  • Update existing version to fix OpenAPI spec quality issues in S360.
  • Other, please clarify:
    • Fixing spec to reflect actual service behavior (identity, properties are required). We are in Public Preview and this is the behavior customers have been experiencing, but the SDK team noticed we missed marking the property required in the swagger. Fixing the discrepancy - there is no new breaking change for customers using the service.

Due diligence checklist

To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:

  • I confirm this PR is modifying Azure Resource Manager (ARM) related specifications, and not data plane related specifications.
  • I have reviewed following Resource Provider guidelines, including
    ARM resource provider contract and
    REST guidelines (estimated time: 4 hours).
    I understand this is required before I can proceed to the diagram Step 2, "ARM API changes review", for this PR.

Additional information

Viewing API changes

For convenient view of the API changes made by this PR, refer to the URLs provided in the table
in the Generated ApiView comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff.

Suppressing failures

If one or multiple validation error/warning suppression(s) is detected in your PR, please follow the
suppressions guide to get approval.

Getting help

  • First, please carefully read through this PR description, from top to bottom. Please fill out the Purpose of this PR and Due diligence checklist.
  • To understand what you must do next to merge this PR, see the Next Steps to Merge comment. It will appear within few minutes of submitting this PR and will continue to be up-to-date with current PR state.
  • For guidance on fixing this PR CI check failures, see the hyperlinks provided in given failure
    and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.
  • For help with PR workflow diagram Step 2 (ARM review), see https://aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review.
  • If the PR CI checks appear to be stuck in queued state, please add a comment with contents /azp run.
    This should result in a new comment denoting a PR validation pipeline has started and the checks should be updated after few minutes.
  • If the help provided by the previous points is not enough, post to https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel and link to this PR.

Update to reflect service behavior

Description/sample updates
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 17, 2024

Next Steps to Merge

✅ All automated merging requirements have been met! To get your PR merged, see aka.ms/azsdk/specreview/merge.

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 17, 2024

Swagger Validation Report

️❌BreakingChange: 8 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
Compared specs (v0.10.8) new version base version
storageactions.json 2023-01-01(c4d2940) 2023-01-01(main)
Rule Message
1025 - RequiredStatusChange The 'required' status changed from the old version('False') to the new version('True').
New: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L519:7
Old: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L519:7
1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'identity, properties' that was not found in the old version.
New: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L78:13
Old: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L78:13
1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'identity, properties' that was not found in the old version.
New: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L93:13
Old: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L93:13
1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'identity, properties' that was not found in the old version.
New: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L99:13
Old: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L99:13
1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'identity, properties' that was not found in the old version.
New: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L200:13
Old: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L200:13
1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'identity, properties' that was not found in the old version.
New: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L249:13
Old: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L249:13
1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'identity, properties' that was not found in the old version.
New: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L735:11
Old: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L731:11
1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'identity, properties' that was not found in the old version.
New: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L517:5
Old: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L517:5
️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
Compared specs (v2.2.2) new version base version
package-2023-01-01 package-2023-01-01(c4d2940) package-2023-01-01(main)

The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

Rule Message
PutResponseCodes Synchronous and long-running PUT operations must have responses with 200, 201 and default return codes. They also must not have other response codes.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L56
PatchBodyParametersSchema Properties of a PATCH request body must not be required, property:type.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L234
PatchBodyParametersSchema Properties of a PATCH request body must not be required, property:enabled.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L234
PatchBodyParametersSchema Properties of a PATCH request body must not be required, property:description.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L234
PatchBodyParametersSchema Properties of a PATCH request body must not be required, property:action.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L234
PatchBodyParametersSchema Properties of a PATCH request body must not be required, property:if.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L234
PatchBodyParametersSchema Properties of a PATCH request body must not be required, property:condition.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L234
PatchBodyParametersSchema Properties of a PATCH request body must not be required, property:operations.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L234
AvoidAdditionalProperties Definitions must not have properties named additionalProperties except for user defined tags or predefined references.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L524
AvoidAdditionalProperties Definitions must not have properties named additionalProperties except for user defined tags or predefined references.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L524
AvoidAdditionalProperties Definitions must not have properties named additionalProperties except for user defined tags or predefined references.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L555
AvoidAdditionalProperties Definitions must not have properties named additionalProperties except for user defined tags or predefined references.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L555
AvoidAdditionalProperties Definitions must not have properties named additionalProperties except for user defined tags or predefined references.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L582
AvoidAdditionalProperties Definitions must not have properties named additionalProperties except for user defined tags or predefined references.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L582
AvoidAdditionalProperties Definitions must not have properties named additionalProperties except for user defined tags or predefined references.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L621
AvoidAdditionalProperties Definitions must not have properties named additionalProperties except for user defined tags or predefined references.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L625
AvoidAdditionalProperties Definitions must not have properties named additionalProperties except for user defined tags or predefined references.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L644
AvoidAdditionalProperties Definitions must not have properties named additionalProperties except for user defined tags or predefined references.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L662
AvoidAdditionalProperties Definitions must not have properties named additionalProperties except for user defined tags or predefined references.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L694
AvoidAdditionalProperties Definitions must not have properties named additionalProperties except for user defined tags or predefined references.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L735
AvoidAdditionalProperties Definitions must not have properties named additionalProperties except for user defined tags or predefined references.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L735
⚠️ OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'StorageTaskAssignmentModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'StorageTaskAssignment' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L360
⚠️ UniqueXmsExample Do not have duplicate name of x-ms-example, make sure every x-ms-example name unique. Duplicate x-ms-example: ListStorageTasksByResourceGroup
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L413
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes Not using the common-types defined parameter 'location'.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L483
⚠️ EnumInsteadOfBoolean Booleans properties are not descriptive in all cases and can make them to use, evaluate whether is makes sense to keep the property as boolean or turn it into an enum.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L574
⚠️ EnumInsteadOfBoolean Booleans properties are not descriptive in all cases and can make them to use, evaluate whether is makes sense to keep the property as boolean or turn it into an enum.
Location: Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json#L981
️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passed for PoliCheck.
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
️️✔️Automated merging requirements met succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 17, 2024

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
 Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
️❌ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 failed [Detail]
  • Failed in generating from 8cbc671daa5e025927f2d983151cbcfe1f4b6ec0. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
    command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] GeneratePackage: /mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:714
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] Line |
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]  714 |          GeneratePackage -projectFolder $projectFolder -sdkRootPath $s …
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]      |          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]      | Failed to build sdk. exit code: False
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] GeneratePackage: /mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:714
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] Line |
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]  714 |          GeneratePackage -projectFolder $projectFolder -sdkRootPath $s …
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]      |          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]      | Failed to packe sdk. exit code: False
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] Get-ChildItem: /mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:807
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] Line |
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]  807 |  … rtifacts += Get-ChildItem $artifactsPath -Filter *.nupkg -exclude *.s …
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]      |                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]      | Cannot find path
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]      | '/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/artifacts/packages/Debug/' because
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]      | it does not exist.
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] GeneratePackage: /mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:714
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] Line |
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]  714 |          GeneratePackage -projectFolder $projectFolder -sdkRootPath $s …
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]      |          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]      | Failed to generate sdk artifact
  • Azure.ResourceManager.Storageactions [Preview SDK Changes]
    info	[Changelog]
️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python warning [Detail]
  • ⚠️Warning in generating from 8cbc671daa5e025927f2d983151cbcfe1f4b6ec0. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh]
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 10.5.0 -> 10.7.0
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v10.7.0>
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g [email protected]` to update!
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] npm notice
    command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️azure-mgmt-storageactions [Preview SDK Changes]
    • azure_mgmt_storageactions-1.0.0b1-py3-none-any.whl
    • azure-mgmt-storageactions-1.0.0b1.zip
️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-java succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
  • ️✔️Succeeded in generating from 8cbc671daa5e025927f2d983151cbcfe1f4b6ec0. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
    command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-storageactions [Preview SDK Changes]
    • pom.xml
    • azure-resourcemanager-storageactions-1.0.0-beta.2.jar
    • azure-resourcemanager-storageactions-1.0.0-beta.2-sources.jar
️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
  • ️✔️Succeeded in generating from 8cbc671daa5e025927f2d983151cbcfe1f4b6ec0. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
    command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/storageactions/armstorageactions [Preview SDK Changes]
    info	[Changelog] ### Other Changes
    info	[Changelog]
    info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 0 additive change(s).
️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
  • ️✔️Succeeded in generating from 8cbc671daa5e025927f2d983151cbcfe1f4b6ec0. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
    warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
    command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️@azure/arm-storageactions [Preview SDK Changes]
    • azure-arm-storageactions-1.0.0.tgz
    info	[Changelog]
    error	breakingChangeTracking is enabled, but version or changelogItem is not found in output.
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 17, 2024

@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Apr 19, 2024
Copy link

Please address or respond to feedback from the ARM API reviewer.
When you are ready to continue the ARM API review, please remove the ARMChangesRequested label.
This will notify the reviewer to have another look.
If the feedback provided needs further discussion, please use this Teams channel to post your questions - aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel.
Please include [ARM Query] in the title of your question to indicate that it is ARM-related.

@golddove golddove removed the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label Apr 19, 2024
@openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Apr 19, 2024
@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Apr 19, 2024
@golddove golddove added WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required BreakingChange-Approved-BugFix Changes are to correct the REST API definition to correctly describe service behavior and removed ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test labels Apr 19, 2024
@openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Apr 19, 2024
@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added NotReadyForARMReview and removed ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review labels May 1, 2024
@golddove golddove added WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required and removed NotReadyForARMReview labels May 1, 2024
@TimLovellSmith
Copy link
Member

      "description": "Storage Task Arm Id."

Another description you can reword:

[same feedback about try to avoid referring to ARM - its just an implementation detail from the point of view of anyone reading Azure API docs. ]

Could reword to: "The Azure Storage Task resource ID"
(or is it just 'an ID', not 'the ID'?)


Refers to: specification/storageactions/resource-manager/Microsoft.StorageActions/stable/2023-01-01/storageactions.json:908 in 43a9ee3. [](commit_id = 43a9ee3, deletion_comment = False)

@TimLovellSmith TimLovellSmith added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label May 2, 2024
Copy link
Member

@TimLovellSmith TimLovellSmith left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Signing off with minor comments you can address before merging

@TimLovellSmith TimLovellSmith removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label May 2, 2024
@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added NotReadyForARMReview and removed ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review labels May 2, 2024
@golddove golddove added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label May 2, 2024
@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added NotReadyForARMReview and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels May 2, 2024
@golddove golddove added WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required and removed NotReadyForARMReview labels May 2, 2024
@TimLovellSmith TimLovellSmith added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label May 2, 2024
@golddove golddove added MergeRequested and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels May 2, 2024
@madhura-np madhura-np merged commit 8f19688 into main May 8, 2024
30 of 32 checks passed
@madhura-np madhura-np deleted the golddove-storageactions-Microsoft.StorageActions-2023-01-01 branch May 8, 2024 05:27
Francisco-Gamino pushed a commit to Francisco-Gamino/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2024
…zure#28718)

* Address SDK team feedback:

Update to reflect service behavior

Description/sample updates

* Fix required level

* Address model validation errors

* Prettier

* Also fix properties to required to match service behavior

* Reword descriptions
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review BreakingChange-Approved-BugFix Changes are to correct the REST API definition to correctly describe service behavior BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test resource-manager
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants