Add all missing TS integ tests & remove integ-tests.old.ts

[antoniosarosi]

Final PR after #1593 & #1639

Important

Add comprehensive integration tests for dynamic clients, types, media, providers, retry policies, and tracing, and remove outdated test file.

• New Tests:
  • Add dynamic-clients.test.ts for testing dynamic client registration and usage.
  • Add dynamic-types.test.ts for testing dynamic type handling, including classes, enums, and literals.
  • Add media.test.ts for testing image and audio input handling.
  • Add prompt_renderer.test.ts for testing prompt rendering with aliasing.
  • Add retry.test.ts for testing retry policies and fallbacks.
  • Add tracing.test.ts for testing synchronous and asynchronous tracing, and event logging.
• Provider Tests:
  • Add tests for Anthropic, AWS, Azure, and OpenAI providers, including streaming and error handling.
• File Removal:
  • Remove integ-tests.test.ts.old, consolidating tests into new files.

^{This description was created by for ae7bc16. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
baml	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	May 28, 2025 6:10pm

[ellipsis-dev]

Caution

Changes requested ❌

Reviewed everything up to ae7bc16 in 1 minute and 54 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 1154 lines of code in 12 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 5 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. integ-tests/typescript/tests/providers/aws.test.ts:205

• Draft comment:
  Remove the use of 'it.only' to avoid restricting the test suite to only this test.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

2. integ-tests/typescript/tests/providers/aws.test.ts:348

• Draft comment:
  Remove 'it.only' here as well. Debug-only markers can prevent other tests from running.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

3. integ-tests/typescript/tests/tracing.test.ts:68

• Draft comment:
  The fixed assertion 'expect(stats.started).toBe(28)' may be brittle if tracing internals change. Consider a more flexible assertion (e.g. checking a minimum count).
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

4. integ-tests/typescript/tests/tracing.test.ts:80

• Draft comment:
  Review the use of console.log statements in test callbacks; consider removing or reducing them to avoid noisy test output.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50% <= threshold 50% None

5. integ-tests/typescript/tests/dynamic-clients.test.ts:12

• Draft comment:
  Typographical note: The variable name 'capitol' on this line might be a typo. If you intended to refer to the city's capital or a metaphor for something else, consider renaming it to 'capital' to avoid confusion.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% Without more context about what ExpectFailure returns or what this test is actually checking for, we can't be certain that 'capitol' is wrong. 'Capitol' is a valid English word (meaning a government building), and this could be intentional. The variable name choice doesn't impact functionality, and this seems like a nitpicky comment. The spelling could actually be intentional - maybe the test is specifically checking for something related to a capitol building in London? Even if it is a typo, this kind of minor variable naming issue in a test file doesn't warrant a comment - it doesn't affect functionality or code quality significantly. Delete this comment. It's speculative, not clearly wrong, and focuses on an unimportant detail in test code.

Workflow ID: wflow_cP1srfHaYjJhSZ8f

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}

[ellipsis-dev]

Remove the it.only in the OpenAI shorthand streaming test to ensure all tests run.

Suggested change

	it.only('should support OpenAI shorthand streaming', async () => {
	it('should support OpenAI shorthand streaming', async () => {

[ellipsis-dev]

Consider removing the commented-out streaming failure test if it's no longer needed to keep the codebase clean.