Skip to content

fix(installer): Handle expected hook SIGTERMs #36396

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2025

Conversation

BaptisteFoy
Copy link
Contributor

@BaptisteFoy BaptisteFoy commented Apr 23, 2025

What does this PR do?

In the installer in agent scenario, when running a start / stop / promote experiment, the currently running installer is stopped. Then systemd will send a SIGTERM to any children. These children include the hook that ran the systemctl stop command. This results in hooks failing and the whole operation being reported as an error to the backend.

This PR does two things:

  • In the installer binary, wait 10s at most when receiving a SIGTERM to let children commands finish
  • Makes sure we properly catch SIGTERM when executing systemctl through Go's exec package
    • Go's exec always return exit code -1 when the process is terminated by a signal, and the actual signal is hidden in a deeper struct

Motivation

Avoiding useless retries in the backend

Describe how you validated your changes

Manual QA on a VM

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@BaptisteFoy BaptisteFoy added changelog/no-changelog qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/fleet-automation labels Apr 23, 2025
@BaptisteFoy BaptisteFoy marked this pull request as ready for review April 23, 2025 09:54
@BaptisteFoy BaptisteFoy requested review from a team as code owners April 23, 2025 09:54
@github-actions github-actions bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Apr 23, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Apr 23, 2025

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

dda inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=63161564 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 6b05b12

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Apr 23, 2025

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor db7e98fd4406d6f56782c69fcdec70a1019506da

Size reduction summary
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm -0.00MB 801.23MB 801.23MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse -0.00MB 801.23MB 801.23MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm -0.00MB 791.09MB 791.10MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb -0.00MB 792.29MB 792.29MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb -0.00MB 782.17MB 782.18MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb -0.01MB 439.63MB 439.64MB 0.50MB
Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 31.17MB 31.17MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 31.25MB 31.25MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 31.25MB 31.25MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 29.99MB 29.99MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 60.74MB 60.74MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 60.81MB 60.81MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 60.81MB 60.81MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 58.04MB 58.04MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 58.11MB 58.11MB 0.50MB

Decision

✅ Passed

Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Apr 23, 2025

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: ac58c423-7f1d-48bf-833d-5edbb767f435

Baseline: db7e98f
Comparison: 6b05b12
Diff

❌ Experiments with missing or malformed data

This is a critical error. No usable optimization goal data was produced by the listed experiments. This may be a result of misconfiguration. Ping #single-machine-performance and we can help out.

  • ddot_traces (Logs)

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization +1.42 [-2.42, +5.26] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_logs memory utilization +1.17 [+1.01, +1.33] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_metrics memory utilization +0.46 [+0.32, +0.61] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.33 [+0.27, +0.40] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
ddot_metrics memory utilization +0.24 [+0.20, +0.29] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.07 [-0.83, +0.97] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.05 [-0.77, +0.86] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.04 [-0.86, +0.94] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.03 [-0.92, +0.97] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.02 [-0.78, +0.82] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.26, +0.26] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.03, +0.01] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput -0.02 [-0.91, +0.87] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.05 [-0.26, +0.17] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.05 [-0.85, +0.74] 1 Logs
docker_containers_memory memory utilization -0.24 [-0.30, -0.18] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.64 [-1.49, +0.22] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -0.75 [-3.48, +1.98] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.76 [-0.82, -0.70] 1 Logs
ddot_logs memory utilization -0.80 [-0.85, -0.75] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders memory utilization -1.24 [-1.28, -1.19] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_traces memory utilization -1.56 [-1.83, -1.28] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -3.38 [-3.50, -3.27] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_tree memory utilization -3.54 [-3.72, -3.36] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
docker_containers_memory memory_usage 9/10
docker_containers_cpu simple_check_run 10/10
docker_containers_memory simple_check_run 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Apr 23, 2025

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates

Successful checks

Info

Result Quality gate On disk size On disk size limit On wire size On wire size limit
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_amd64 766.2 MiB 778.06 MiB 186.57 MiB 191.06 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_amd64_fips 764.13 MiB 776.09 MiB 185.87 MiB 190.72 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_heroku_amd64 427.33 MiB 434.99 MiB 112.47 MiB 114.34 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_msi 955.15 MiB 978.45 MiB 147.36 MiB 151.65 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_amd64 766.3 MiB 778.06 MiB 188.51 MiB 193.42 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_amd64_fips 764.21 MiB 776.06 MiB 188.38 MiB 192.61 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_arm64 756.51 MiB 768.33 MiB 170.84 MiB 174.71 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_arm64_fips 754.68 MiB 766.55 MiB 169.99 MiB 173.92 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_amd64 766.22 MiB 778.08 MiB 188.51 MiB 193.42 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_amd64_fips 764.23 MiB 776.11 MiB 188.38 MiB 192.78 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_arm64 756.63 MiB 768.31 MiB 170.84 MiB 174.71 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_arm64_fips 754.65 MiB 766.5 MiB 169.99 MiB 173.92 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_amd64 850.9 MiB 862.5 MiB 286.25 MiB 292.0 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_arm64 864.51 MiB 876.0 MiB 272.94 MiB 278.3 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_amd64 850.9 MiB 862.5 MiB 286.25 MiB 292.0 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_arm64 864.51 MiB 876.63 MiB 272.94 MiB 278.4 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_windows1809 850.9 MiB 862.5 MiB 286.25 MiB 292.0 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_windows1809_core 850.9 MiB 862.5 MiB 286.25 MiB 292.0 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_windows1809_core_jmx 850.9 MiB 862.5 MiB 286.25 MiB 292.0 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_windows1809_jmx 850.9 MiB 862.5 MiB 286.25 MiB 292.0 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_windows2022 850.9 MiB 862.5 MiB 286.25 MiB 292.0 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_windows2022_core 850.9 MiB 862.5 MiB 286.25 MiB 292.0 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_windows2022_core_jmx 850.9 MiB 862.5 MiB 286.25 MiB 292.0 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_windows2022_jmx 850.9 MiB 862.5 MiB 286.25 MiB 292.0 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_amd64 261.85 MiB 263.4 MiB 102.86 MiB 104.07 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_arm64 277.81 MiB 279.38 MiB 97.76 MiB 98.95 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 6.66 MiB 7.12 MiB 2.82 MiB 3.29 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.44 MiB 6.92 MiB 2.6 MiB 3.07 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_amd64 37.94 MiB 46.39 MiB 14.63 MiB 17.78 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_arm64 36.86 MiB 45.05 MiB 13.71 MiB 16.65 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_amd64 29.8 MiB 38.4 MiB 7.88 MiB 10.26 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_arm64 28.68 MiB 36.98 MiB 6.87 MiB 8.96 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 29.8 MiB 38.4 MiB 7.89 MiB 10.27 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_suse_amd64 29.8 MiB 38.4 MiB 7.89 MiB 10.27 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_amd64 58.0 MiB 58.51 MiB 14.59 MiB 15.02 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_arm64 55.42 MiB 55.94 MiB 12.61 MiB 13.05 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_armhf 54.12 MiB 54.32 MiB 12.61 MiB 13.05 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_amd64 58.0 MiB 58.51 MiB 14.62 MiB 15.04 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_arm64 55.43 MiB 55.94 MiB 12.63 MiB 13.07 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_suse_amd64 58.0 MiB 58.51 MiB 14.62 MiB 15.04 MiB

@BaptisteFoy BaptisteFoy force-pushed the baptiste.foy/FA/handle-expected-sigterms branch from 75fee3e to 6b05b12 Compare April 24, 2025 07:17
@BaptisteFoy
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Apr 24, 2025

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-04-24 09:25:27 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2025-04-24 09:25:31 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 49m (p90).


2025-04-24 11:10:49 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit c20fcf2 into main Apr 24, 2025
535 of 539 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the baptiste.foy/FA/handle-expected-sigterms branch April 24, 2025 11:10
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.67.0 milestone Apr 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/fleet-automation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants