-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
fix(installer): Handle expected hook SIGTERMs #36396
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: dda inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=63161564 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit 6b05b12 |
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Size reduction summary
Diff per package
Decision✅ Passed |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: db7e98f ❌ Experiments with missing or malformed dataThis is a critical error. No usable optimization goal data was produced by the listed experiments. This may be a result of misconfiguration. Ping #single-machine-performance and we can help out.
Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | +1.42 | [-2.42, +5.26] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | otlp_ingest_logs | memory utilization | +1.17 | [+1.01, +1.33] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | otlp_ingest_metrics | memory utilization | +0.46 | [+0.32, +0.61] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.33 | [+0.27, +0.40] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | ddot_metrics | memory utilization | +0.24 | [+0.20, +0.29] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.07 | [-0.83, +0.97] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.05 | [-0.77, +0.86] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.04 | [-0.86, +0.94] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.92, +0.97] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.78, +0.82] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.26, +0.26] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.03, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.91, +0.87] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | -0.05 | [-0.26, +0.17] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.05 | [-0.85, +0.74] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | docker_containers_memory | memory utilization | -0.24 | [-0.30, -0.18] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.64 | [-1.49, +0.22] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -0.75 | [-3.48, +1.98] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.76 | [-0.82, -0.70] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | ddot_logs | memory utilization | -0.80 | [-0.85, -0.75] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders | memory utilization | -1.24 | [-1.28, -1.19] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | otlp_ingest_traces | memory utilization | -1.56 | [-1.83, -1.28] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -3.38 | [-3.50, -3.27] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -3.54 | [-3.72, -3.36] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
❌ | docker_containers_memory | memory_usage | 9/10 | |
✅ | docker_containers_cpu | simple_check_run | 10/10 | |
✅ | docker_containers_memory | simple_check_run | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
Static quality checks✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates Successful checksInfo
|
75fee3e
to
6b05b12
Compare
/merge |
View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.
The expected merge time in
|
What does this PR do?
In the installer in agent scenario, when running a start / stop / promote experiment, the currently running installer is stopped. Then
systemd
will send aSIGTERM
to any children. These children include the hook that ran thesystemctl stop
command. This results in hooks failing and the whole operation being reported as an error to the backend.This PR does two things:
SIGTERM
when executingsystemctl
through Go'sexec
packageexec
always return exit code-1
when the process is terminated by a signal, and the actual signal is hidden in a deeper structMotivation
Avoiding useless retries in the backend
Describe how you validated your changes
Manual QA on a VM
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes