Skip to content

bug(nightly-benchmark): set of issues with the workflow #2933

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
4 tasks
rymnc opened this issue Apr 8, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
4 tasks

bug(nightly-benchmark): set of issues with the workflow #2933

rymnc opened this issue Apr 8, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working tech-debt The issue is to improve the current code and make it more clear/generic/reusable/pretty/avoidable.

Comments

@rymnc
Copy link
Member

rymnc commented Apr 8, 2025

mainly derived from #2932

@rymnc rymnc added bug Something isn't working tech-debt The issue is to improve the current code and make it more clear/generic/reusable/pretty/avoidable. labels Apr 8, 2025
AurelienFT added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 22, 2025
## Linked Issues/PRs
Part of #2933

## Description
Verified all missing opcodes, they now all have a bench.

## Checklist
- [x] Breaking changes are clearly marked as such in the PR description
and changelog
- [x] New behavior is reflected in tests
- [x] [The specification](https://github.com/FuelLabs/fuel-specs/)
matches the implemented behavior (link update PR if changes are needed)

### Before requesting review
- [x] I have reviewed the code myself
- [x] I have created follow-up issues caused by this PR and linked them
here

Co-authored-by: Green Baneling <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Aaryamann Challani <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working tech-debt The issue is to improve the current code and make it more clear/generic/reusable/pretty/avoidable.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant