-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
Remove immutable annotation from nodeType to support vertical scaling for redis cluster. #13190
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove immutable annotation from nodeType to support vertical scaling for redis cluster. #13190
Conversation
Hello! I am a robot. Tests will require approval from a repository maintainer to run. @slevenick, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to review your changes. If you have not received review feedback within 2 business days, please leave a comment on this PR asking them to take a look. You can help make sure that review is quick by doing a self-review and by running impacted tests locally. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add a test that updates this field so we are sure that the update functionality works?
@slevenick the update is still behind an experiment flag, which will be ramped up soon (in ~1-2 weeks). I will add a test post that if that works. I have tested the functionality locally for allowlisted projects. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should only add support for this once it works for everyone. So lets add the test here and wait for rollout before merging
d9e51da
to
47f3545
Compare
/gcbrun |
/gcbrun looks like it hit a 500 error on GitHub |
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 30 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 8 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
🟢 Tests passed during RECORDING mode: 🟢 No issues found for passed tests after REPLAYING rerun. 🔴 Tests failed during RECORDING mode: 🔴 Errors occurred during RECORDING mode. Please fix them to complete your PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like update mask is causing issues in the tests
47f3545
to
daa17b3
Compare
/gcbrun |
daa17b3
to
8bc4bdb
Compare
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 30 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 2 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
🟢 Tests passed during RECORDING mode: 🟢 No issues found for passed tests after REPLAYING rerun. 🔴 Tests failed during RECORDING mode: 🔴 Errors occurred during RECORDING mode. Please fix them to complete your PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall good, just want to make sure we aren't deleting this between test steps
// create cluster with replica count 1 | ||
Config: createOrUpdateRedisCluster(&ClusterParams{name: name, replicaCount: 1, shardCount: 3, deletionProtectionEnabled: true, nodeType: "REDIS_STANDARD_SMALL", zoneDistributionMode: "MULTI_ZONE", maintenanceDay: "TUESDAY", maintenanceHours: 2, maintenanceMinutes: 0, maintenanceSeconds: 0, maintenanceNanos: 0}), | ||
// create cluster with node type "REDIS_STANDARD_SMALL" | ||
Config: createOrUpdateRedisCluster(&ClusterParams{name: name, replicaCount: 1, shardCount: 3, deletionProtectionEnabled: false, nodeType: "REDIS_STANDARD_SMALL", zoneDistributionMode: "MULTI_ZONE", maintenanceDay: "TUESDAY", maintenanceHours: 2, maintenanceMinutes: 0, maintenanceSeconds: 0, maintenanceNanos: 0}), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Config: createOrUpdateRedisCluster(&ClusterParams{name: name, replicaCount: 1, shardCount: 3, deletionProtectionEnabled: false, nodeType: "REDIS_STANDARD_SMALL", zoneDistributionMode: "MULTI_ZONE", maintenanceDay: "TUESDAY", maintenanceHours: 2, maintenanceMinutes: 0, maintenanceSeconds: 0, maintenanceNanos: 0}), | |
Config: createOrUpdateRedisCluster(&ClusterParams{name: name, replicaCount: 1, shardCount: 3, deletionProtectionEnabled: true, nodeType: "REDIS_STANDARD_SMALL", zoneDistributionMode: "MULTI_ZONE", maintenanceDay: "TUESDAY", maintenanceHours: 2, maintenanceMinutes: 0, maintenanceSeconds: 0, maintenanceNanos: 0}), |
This will make sure it won't get deleted during the next step. Keep it false after the last step to ensure we can actually delete it
}, | ||
{ | ||
// update cluster with node type "REDIS_HIGHMEM_MEDIUM" | ||
Config: createOrUpdateRedisCluster(&ClusterParams{name: name, replicaCount: 1, shardCount: 3, deletionProtectionEnabled: false, nodeType: "REDIS_HIGHMEM_MEDIUM", zoneDistributionMode: "MULTI_ZONE", maintenanceDay: "TUESDAY", maintenanceHours: 2, maintenanceMinutes: 0, maintenanceSeconds: 0, maintenanceNanos: 0}), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same here, flip to true
Config: createOrUpdateRedisCluster(&ClusterParams{name: name, replicaCount: 1, shardCount: 3, deletionProtectionEnabled: false, nodeType: "REDIS_HIGHMEM_MEDIUM", zoneDistributionMode: "MULTI_ZONE", maintenanceDay: "TUESDAY", maintenanceHours: 2, maintenanceMinutes: 0, maintenanceSeconds: 0, maintenanceNanos: 0}), | |
Config: createOrUpdateRedisCluster(&ClusterParams{name: name, replicaCount: 1, shardCount: 3, deletionProtectionEnabled: true, nodeType: "REDIS_HIGHMEM_MEDIUM", zoneDistributionMode: "MULTI_ZONE", maintenanceDay: "TUESDAY", maintenanceHours: 2, maintenanceMinutes: 0, maintenanceSeconds: 0, maintenanceNanos: 0}), |
8bc4bdb
to
add8ca1
Compare
/gcbrun |
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 30 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 2 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
🟢 Tests passed during RECORDING mode: 🟢 No issues found for passed tests after REPLAYING rerun. 🔴 Tests failed during RECORDING mode: 🔴 Errors occurred during RECORDING mode. Please fix them to complete your PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! Failing test is unrelated
7d569ca
Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)
See Write release notes for guidance.