-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
Clarify recommendation for simple map types #13551
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR hasn't generated any diffs, but I'll let you know if a future commit does. |
@modular-magician reassign-reviewer |
Hello! I am a robot. Tests will require approval from a repository maintainer to run. Googlers: see go/terraform-auto-test-runs to set up automatic test runs. @trodge, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to review your changes. If you have not received review feedback within 2 business days, please leave a comment on this PR asking them to take a look. You can help make sure that review is quick by doing a self-review and by running impacted tests locally. |
@modular-magician reassign-reviewer |
@modular-magician reassign-reviewer |
Fixes b/385136052
KeyValuePairs
is strictly defined to mean string -> string, so for other simple map types like string -> int, we will recommend the Map type.Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)
See Write release notes for guidance.