fuse-t-sshfs 1.0.2 (new cask)

[srozzo]

Added fuse-t-sshfs

Important: Do not tick a checkbox if you haven’t performed its action. Honesty is indispensable for a smooth review process.

In the following questions <cask> is the token of the cask you're submitting.

After making any changes to a cask, existing or new, verify:

• The submission is for a stable version or documented exception.
• brew audit --cask --online <cask> is error-free.
• brew style --fix <cask> reports no offenses.

Additionally, if adding a new cask:

• Named the cask according to the token reference.
• Checked the cask was not already refused (add your cask's name to the end of the search field).
• brew audit --cask --new <cask> worked successfully.
• HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --cask <cask> worked successfully.
• brew uninstall --cask <cask> worked successfully.

---

[srozzo]

Audit output:

▶ brew audit --cask --new fuse-t-sshfs
==> Downloading and extracting artifacts
==> Downloading https://github.com/macos-fuse-t/sshfs/releases/download/1.0.2/sshfs-macos-installer-1.0.2.pkg
Already downloaded: /Users/<redacted>/Library/Caches/Homebrew/downloads/14d161c86a379c0b778cfafafe1721918e16a6a7847b492c6d28b554899613b4--sshfs-macos-installer-1.0.2.pkg
==> Downloading https://github.com/macos-fuse-t/sshfs/releases/download/1.0.2/sshfs-macos-installer-1.0.2.pkg
Already downloaded: /Users/<redacted>/Library/Caches/Homebrew/downloads/14d161c86a379c0b778cfafafe1721918e16a6a7847b492c6d28b554899613b4--sshfs-macos-installer-1.0.2.pkg
audit for fuse-t-sshfs: failed
 - GitHub repository not notable enough (<30 forks, <30 watchers and <75 stars)
fuse-t-sshfs
  * line 5, col 2: GitHub repository not notable enough (<30 forks, <30 watchers and <75 stars)
Error: 1 problem in 1 cask detected.

Not sure how gating this is.

[bevanjkay]

Is there a particular reason this cannot be built as a Formula instead?

See https://docs.brew.sh/Acceptable-Casks#rejected-casks

App is both open-source and CLI-only (i.e. it only uses the binary artifact). In that case, and in the spirit of deduplication, submit it first to homebrew/core as a formula that builds from source. If it is rejected, you may then try again as a cask (link to the issue from your pull request so we can see the discussion and reasoning for rejection).

[srozzo]

Ok. I will give core a shot.