Skip to content

Backport: Don't treat ConstantOperator as a zeroop #593

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

jishnub
Copy link
Member

@jishnub jishnub commented Sep 12, 2023

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 12, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +18.75% 🎉

Comparison is base (b5cd67e) 52.51% compared to head (d8316a8) 71.27%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           backport_0.8     #593       +/-   ##
=================================================
+ Coverage         52.51%   71.27%   +18.75%     
=================================================
  Files                81       81               
  Lines              8517     8592       +75     
=================================================
+ Hits               4473     6124     +1651     
+ Misses             4044     2468     -1576     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
src/Operators/banded/ConstantOperator.jl 80.68% <ø> (+20.45%) ⬆️

... and 66 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jishnub jishnub merged commit 4556d0e into JuliaApproximation:backport_0.8 Sep 12, 2023
@jishnub jishnub deleted the backportiszeroopconst branch September 12, 2023 09:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant