Skip to content

Extend EfficientNet readme #5895

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2025
Merged

Conversation

JanuszL
Copy link
Contributor

@JanuszL JanuszL commented Apr 24, 2025

  • adds recently added processing backends to the EfficientNet readme

Category:

Other (e.g. Documentation, Tests, Configuration)

Description:

  • adds recently added processing backends to the EfficientNet readme

Additional information:

Affected modules and functionalities:

  • EfficientNet example readme

Key points relevant for the review:

Tests:

  • Existing tests apply
  • New tests added
    • Python tests
    • GTests
    • Benchmark
    • Other
  • N/A

Checklist

Documentation

  • Existing documentation applies
  • Documentation updated
    • Docstring
    • Doxygen
    • RST
    • Jupyter
    • Other
  • N/A

DALI team only

Requirements

  • Implements new requirements
  • Affects existing requirements
  • N/A

REQ IDs: N/A

JIRA TASK: N/A

- adds recently added processing backends to the EfficientNet readme

Signed-off-by: Janusz Lisiecki <[email protected]>
@JanuszL
Copy link
Contributor Author

JanuszL commented Apr 24, 2025

!build

@dali-automaton
Copy link
Collaborator

CI MESSAGE: [27442189]: BUILD STARTED

@dali-automaton
Copy link
Collaborator

CI MESSAGE: [27442189]: BUILD FAILED

@dali-automaton
Copy link
Collaborator

CI MESSAGE: [27442189]: BUILD PASSED

@JanuszL JanuszL merged commit c97c96f into NVIDIA:main Apr 25, 2025
7 checks passed
@JanuszL JanuszL deleted the improve_effnet_readme branch April 25, 2025 08:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants