-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7k
remove http_signature_test from samples when not supported #15221
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
tiffmaelite
wants to merge
1
commit into
OpenAPITools:master
from
tiffmaelite:fix/remove_signature_auth_from_samples_when_not_supported
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tiffmaelite thanks for the PR but why not still include the test anyway as it shouldn't break the client/server, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The main reason is that it is misleading to have sample openapi.yaml files suggest that the HTTP signature security scheme is supported by many more generators than those actually supporting it.
However, testing and showing in samples the behavior of all generators when faced with unsupported schemes is important. In particular for the ones throwing exceptions when faced with unsupported security schemes.
As a result, I plan to submit a new PR once this one is merged which explicitly includes an invalid scheme (named "unsupported_test" rather than "http_signature_test", for documentation purposes) and a few additional tests in order to avoid that the issue described in #14876 occurs again.
I can also submit both set of changes in one go, but that will possibly be harder to read and review.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you please PM me via Slack to further discuss this PR when you've time?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@wing328 will do somewhen tomorrow or early next week.
I also wanted to add a last argument here: what is the point of having files named
petstore-with-fake-endpoints-models-for-testing.yaml
andpetstore-with-fake-endpoints-models-for-testing-with-http-signature.yaml
if both contain the http-signature scheme?But maybe it does not make sense to have both of them side by side, because they are quite hard to maintain (and actually one can see that their content on some endpoints diverges already for no other reason than "someone forgot about the other file")