[typescript-fetch] runtime: pass init and url as returned by the premiddleware to the postmiddleware

[FabianSellmann]

Current implementation will always pass the initial url and init object. However if a pre middleware returns an object whose init or url property refer to a different url string or object, any following post middleware wont have access to it. Effectively providing the post middleware with completely different request information then what was actually used to make the fetch call.

The change here is very minimal to use the init and url from the fetchParams as potentially returned by the pre middleware.

PR checklist

• Read the contribution guidelines.
• Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
• Run the following to build the project and update samples:

  ./mvnw clean package 
  ./bin/generate-samples.sh
  ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh
  

  Commit all changed files.
  This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
  These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
  You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
  For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH.
• File the PR against the correct branch: master, 5.1.x, 6.0.x
• If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

[FabianSellmann]

@TiFu (2017/07) @taxpon (2017/07) @sebastianhaas (2017/07) @kenisteward (2017/07) @Vrolijkx (2017/09) @macjohnny (2018/01) @topce (2018/10) @akehir (2019/07) @petejohansonxo (2019/11) @amakhrov (2020/02)
Tagging you guys here, will clone the repo locally and build and update as suggested in the PR template.
Can this be a patch or should I target a different branch?

[amakhrov]

Thanks for your contribution! Looks good to me, nice catch!

[smedina01]

Unsubscribe

…

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021, 9:24 AM Esteban Gehring ***@***.***> wrote: Merged #9716 <#9716> into master. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#9716 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATQVQ43SPMALLNQMWVWY6QTTR6IS5ANCNFSM46JHG6HQ> .