-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
fix(packages): Remove QA registry destinations from image_copy_rules #640
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
We have migrated repositories from `qa/*` to `pingcap/*` and `tikv/*` for about 1 year. It's time to remove the sync rules.
Summary: Critical Issues: Code Improvements:
Best Practices:
By implementing the suggested improvements, the codebase will become more maintainable, readable, and less error-prone, ensuring smoother transitions in the future. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @wuhuizuo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request removes outdated QA registry destinations from the image copy rules, reflecting the completed migration of repositories to new locations. This cleanup ensures that images are no longer synced to the old QA registries, streamlining the image delivery process.
Highlights
- Cleanup: Removed QA registry destinations from
image_copy_rules
inpackages/delivery.yaml
. - Migration Completion: This change finalizes the migration of repositories from
qa/*
topingcap/*
andtikv/*
. - Image Sync Rules: Removed sync rules associated with the old QA registry destinations.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request successfully removes the outdated hub.pingcap.net/qa/*
registry destinations from the image_copy_rules
in packages/delivery.yaml
, aligning with the migration mentioned in the description. The changes appear correct and consistent across the file. I've identified a couple of medium-severity maintainability points regarding potentially unused definitions as a result of these removals.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
@stevenayu: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: stevenayu, wuhuizuo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
We have migrated repositories from
qa/*
topingcap/*
andtikv/*
for about 1 year.It's time to remove the sync rules.