Skip to content

Implement MultipartSign/Verify #525

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 3, 2025

Conversation

daxpedda
Copy link
Contributor

@daxpedda daxpedda commented Jun 1, 2025

Implementation of MultipartSigner and MultipartVerifier added in RustCrypto/traits#1880.

tarcieri pushed a commit to RustCrypto/traits that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2025
This PR adds new traits for multipart messages: `MultipartSigner`,
`RandomizedMultipartSigner`, `RandomizedMultipartSignerMut` and
`MultipartVerifier`.

The idea here is to allow non-contiguous bytes to be passed, which is
necessary when the message has to be constructed from multiple sources
without wanting to allocate memory for a contiguous message. E.g. for
`no_std` environments or when the message is rather big but pre-hashing
is not applicable, e.g. PureEdDSA, ML-DSA or SLH-DSA.

I know this is a rather big breaking change, so let me know what you
think!

These new traits can be implemented by a bunch of crates:
- [x] `ecdsa`: RustCrypto/signatures#982
- [x] `ml-dsa`: RustCrypto/signatures#982
- [x]  `slh-dsa`: RustCrypto/signatures#982
- [x] `bign256`: RustCrypto/elliptic-curves#1221
- [x] `sm2`: RustCrypto/elliptic-curves#1221
- [x] `k256`: RustCrypto/elliptic-curves#1221
- [x] `dsa`: RustCrypto/signatures#982
- [x] `lms`: RustCrypto/signatures#982
- [x] `rsa`: RustCrypto/RSA#525
- [ ] `ed25519-dalek`

Resolves RustCrypto/signatures#959.
@daxpedda daxpedda marked this pull request as ready for review June 2, 2025 22:12
@tarcieri tarcieri merged commit 1ffef57 into RustCrypto:master Jun 3, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants