-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
add_ functions do not all have roxygen comments #330
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Related to #165 |
You're right, there should be roxygen tags here. Would you be willing to PR that? |
@ColinFay I would like to try to do this if no one is working on it. My thinking is that first we should move
from add_modules.R so it can be reused to utils.R. |
Apologies for never following up on this, I intended to but it got lost in
the shuffle. @novica - I am not working on this, so there won't be
duplicated effort :)
Thanks for doing this!
…On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 12:45 PM novica ***@***.***> wrote:
@ColinFay <https://github.com/ColinFay> I would like to try to do this if
no one is working on it.
My thinking is that first we should move
write(..., file = where, append = TRUE)
} ```
from add_modules.R so it can be reused to utils.R.
and then modify add_modules and add_r_files accordingly.
Does this make sense?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#330 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE3WNSGPR46KVQAI5PJU63DRQMFXJANCNFSM4KJ3APNA>
.
|
Maybe: #525 |
This has been implemented in 4fc81ba :) Thanks everyone for the ideas and for contributing 🤘 |
Thanks so much, and my apologies for totally forgetting about trying to
tackle this!
…On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 1:21 PM Colin Fay ***@***.***> wrote:
This has been implemented in 4fc81ba
<4fc81ba>
:)
Thanks everyone for the ideas and for contributing 🤘
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#330 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE3WNSHMH5GHSIZPXWBKP5TS5MFURANCNFSM4KJ3APNA>
.
|
Perhaps I'm missing something obvious, but is there any reason that
golem::add_fct
/add_utils
does not add a roxygen comment section to the resulting file likeadd_module
does to the module files?It seems like it would be helpful to add this for parity across the
add_
functions and to encourage good documentation practices.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: