Skip to content

Fix MI parser to allow async-record w/o a result. #340

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2022

Conversation

brownts
Copy link
Collaborator

@brownts brownts commented Apr 10, 2022

Fixes #339.

This updates the async class regex to not require a trailing comma after
the class name. Since results are optional, scenarios can exist where
there are no results and the regex no longer matches.

A new test case has also been added to test the parser for this
scenario.

This updates the async class regex to not require a trailing comma after
the class name.  Since results are optional, scenarios can exist where
there are no results and the regex no longer matches.

A new test case has also been added to test the parser for this
scenario.
@GitMensch GitMensch merged commit 06004ac into WebFreak001:master Apr 10, 2022
@GitMensch
Copy link
Collaborator

Done cleanly, thanks. This reminds me of #305 and the note about testing. hinthint

:-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

MI Parser only handles async-record with at least one optional result
2 participants