Skip to content
Codespell

Better separate SparqlTriple and SparqlTripleSimple types to avoid accidental mismatches #3181

Sign in to view logs

Better separate SparqlTriple and SparqlTripleSimple types to avoid accidental mismatches

Better separate SparqlTriple and SparqlTripleSimple types to avoid accidental mismatches #3181

Triggered via pull request April 29, 2025 10:44
@RobinTFRobinTF
synchronize #1994
RobinTF:simplify-sparql-triple-class
Status Success
Total duration 1m 2s
Artifacts –

codespell.yml

on: pull_request
Check for spelling errors
23s
Check for spelling errors
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in