-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
[no ticket][risk=low] update tables to latest #4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
project = var.project_id | ||
region = var.region | ||
zone = var.zone | ||
project = "all-of-us-workbench-test" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was this for testing? Revert?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You need it for terraform import
to work in 0.13. Otherwise it tells you it doesn't know how to find the provider. Hopefully it can be removed soon.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't follow, how does this get overridden when we use this module for an environment that is not all-of-us-workbench-test ? If it's not getting overridden, and the module still works properly for other projects, what is this parameter actually doing then?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. I think the right way to do it is to specify the provider only at the highest level.
|
||
# TODO(jaycarlton) codegen this top-level variables as the union | ||
# of all modules' variables files. | ||
# List of objects whose values correspond to the google_monitoring_notification_channel |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This stuff doesn't look relevant to the PR - remove? Minimally, should remove commented out code
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, thought I I needed it, but I guess not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll approve so you aren't blocked tomorrow, but please address my comments
Bring all configs up-to-date, which is still slightly behind, but a good stopping point. We should be able to add a new column now.