Add further filtering of forced indexes on CRDB to discount other shapes

[josephschorr]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.15%. Comparing base (6555287) to head (4afa98e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2437      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.17%   77.15%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         422      422              
  Lines       51219    51228       +9     
==========================================
  Hits        39521    39521              
- Misses       9193     9199       +6     
- Partials     2505     2508       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[tstirrat15]

LGTM, appreciate the test coverage

[tstirrat15]

I'm not entirely clear on the intent of using a map here - I can see that the semantic is that there should only be a single field depth, but I'm not clear on when there could be multiple, or why that would indicate that an index shouldn't be used.

[josephschorr]

Its a set: we need to make sure all filters have the same depth