Skip to content

chore: add Awslc fips next to CI #5349

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

dougch
Copy link
Contributor

@dougch dougch commented Jun 4, 2025

Release Summary:

Resolved issues:

n/a

Description of changes:

This adds a job to test the next version of aws-lc-fips, built against aws-lc's main branch.

Call-outs:

We're going to rename the libcrypto awslc-fips-next.

Testing:

How is this change tested (unit tests, fuzz tests, etc.)? What manual testing was performed? Are there any testing steps to be verified by the reviewer?
How can you convince your reviewers that this PR is safe and effective?
Is this a refactor change? If so, how have you proved that the intended behavior hasn't changed?

Remember:

  • Any change to the library source code should at least include unit tests.
  • Any change to the core stuffer or blob methods should include CBMC proofs.
  • Any change to the CI or tests should:
    1. prove that the test succeeds for good input
    2. prove that the test fails for bad input (eg, a test for memory leaks fails when a memory leak is committed)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the s2n-core team label Jun 4, 2025
@dougch dougch changed the title chore: add Awslc fips next to CI chore: add Awslc fips main to CI Jun 11, 2025
@dougch dougch changed the title chore: add Awslc fips main to CI chore: add Awslc fips next to CI Jun 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant