Open
Description
As discussed offline, there's an inconsistency in the spec whether name == volume_id is possible:
message CreateVolumeRequest {
...
// 2) Suggested name - Some storage systems allow callers to specify
// an identifier by which to refer to the newly provisioned
// storage. If a storage system supports this, it can optionally
// use this name as the identifier for the new volume.
string name = 1;
...
This paragraph is making it sort-of clear that the CO-chosen name may be used as the volume ID. Also, if this is true maybe it could also mention that the volume name generated by CO has to be unique as well - or perhaps that's implied by saying that it can be used as an identifier?
But then in the RPC Interactions section it says:
It is worth noting that the plugin-generated volume_id is a REQUIRED field for the DeleteVolume RPC, as opposed to the CO-generated volume name that is REQUIRED for the CreateVolume RPC: these fields MAY NOT contain the same value.
Which is inconsistent with the comment in the CreateVolumeRequest.