P2786 R13 Trivial Relocatability For C++26

[erichkeane]

P2786R0 Trivially relocatability options (Mungo Gill, Alisdair Meredith)

[erichkeane]

This paper was seen by EWGI with P1144 during the February 10th, 2023 evening session in Issaquah.

The following polls were taken:

Given the committee's limited bandwidth, EWGI believes the problem presented in P1144/P2786 is worth solving.

SF	F	N	A	SA
10	8	0	0	0

Result: Consensus

EWGI believes the problem being introduced in P1144/P2786 should be solved in a more general way instead of as proposed.

SF	F	N	A	SA
3	0	5	6	4

Result: Not Consensus

EWGI believes that the relocatable annotation in P1144R6 is acceptable as an attribute.

SF	F	N	A	SA
0	6	4	6	2

Result: Not Consensus

EWGI believes that the relocatable annotation should just 'trust' the user as presented in P1144R6 (aka sharp knife) instead of be diagnosed, as in P2786R0 (aka 'dull knife').

F	N	A
7	5	6

Result: No obvious preference

Inform the EWG chair that we believe P1144R6 is sufficiently ready to be presented in EWG.

SF	F	N	A	SA
0	7	4	3	1

Result: Not Consensus

Inform the EWG chair that we believe P2786R0 is sufficiently ready to be presented in EWG.

SF	F	N	A	SA
1	8	3	3	1

Result: Weak Consensus

Guidance to the authors was given to work with the author of P1144 to better ensure a more unified set of pros/cons/well thought out behaviors before the discussion in EWG. However, our weak consensus is enough for this paper as-is to be seen by the EWG chair.

[wg21bot]

P2786R1 Trivial relocatability options (Mungo Gill, Alisdair Meredith)

[jfbastien]

#1542 was seen in EWG in Varna, feedback provided.