-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 249
#218 - Correctly resolve relative local paths pointing to patch files from dependencies - Follow up #247
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Is this just waiting on the test coverage? |
I would also love to see some progress on this. Anything we can do to push it forward? |
Yes I think increasing the test coverage would be a nice and the maintainer will be pleased. |
@drupol unfortunately I've never worked with coveralls before and I'm not sure what would be required to increase that coverage stat. |
You do not need coveralls, you just need to write more tests, coveralls will compute the coverage by itself. |
This PR seems to be obsolete due to #267. |
I would be happy to see this PR merged, how can I help ? @drupol |
Resolving patches from dependencies isn't a thing in 2.x, so neither is applying patches stored relative to the root of a dependency. |
This is an updated version of PR #218.