Skip to content

JIT: stop using ehTrueEnclosingTryIndexIL outside of importation #113102

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2025

Conversation

AndyAyersMS
Copy link
Member

@AndyAyersMS AndyAyersMS commented Mar 3, 2025

Once we can inline methods with EH, IL ranges are no longer a reliable indicator of a mutual-protect try regions. Instead, after importation, we can rely on mutual-protect trys having the same start and end blocks.

Also update another case where we were using info.compXcptnsCount in morph to decide if we needed a frame pointer. This lets us simplify the logic around frame pointers and EH (though I still think we're making up our minds too early).

Contributes to #108900.

Once we can inline methods with EH, IL ranges are no longer a reliable indicator
of a mutual-protect try regions. Instead, after importation, we can rely on
mutual-protect trys having the same start and end blocks.

Also update other case where we were using `info.compXcptnsCount` in morph
to decide if we needed a frame pointer. This lets us simplify the logic around
frame pointers and EH (though I still think we're making up our minds too early).

Contributes to dotnet#108900.
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 3, 2025 23:50
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Mar 3, 2025
@AndyAyersMS
Copy link
Member Author

AndyAyersMS commented Mar 3, 2025

@BruceForstall @EgorBo PTAL
cc @dotnet/jit-contrib

Hopefully the last of these...

Has some x86 diffs, no-diff elsewhere.

Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@AndyAyersMS AndyAyersMS merged commit f8f5125 into dotnet:main Mar 4, 2025
113 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 4, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants