Skip to content

performance pipelines triggers unified #113556

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

e-kharion
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@e-kharion e-kharion added the perf-pipeline Issues with dotnet-runtime-perf, or runtime-wasm-perf pipelines label Mar 14, 2025
@e-kharion e-kharion self-assigned this Mar 14, 2025
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Mar 14, 2025
@@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ trigger:
include:
- main
- release/9.0
- release/8.0
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How often do we run microbenchmarks on non-main branches? It seems like we mostly look at data from main anyways.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd think that it's very rare

@e-kharion e-kharion merged commit 20be601 into dotnet:main Mar 17, 2025
25 checks passed
@matouskozak matouskozak added area-Infrastructure and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Mar 17, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 17, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-Infrastructure perf-pipeline Issues with dotnet-runtime-perf, or runtime-wasm-perf pipelines
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants