e2e test cases for the reconcile loop

[abdurrehman107]

This PR refers to the issue #19. We've used the e2e-framework deliver tests.

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abdurrehman107
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign ahrtr for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @abdurrehman107. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a etcd-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[abdurrehman107]

@ahrtr Can we please review the tests I've pushed? I tried adding the Health Check tests too by referring to the Health Check function referred in the Reconcile loop, but it did not work out. I'd appreciate help at that end.

[ahrtr]

It's hard to review such a huge PR. Please only focus on the first step as mentioned in #19 (comment).

[abdurrehman107]

@ahrtr there exist valid e2e tests in this PR, do we want to take those up in another PR? I'll close this one and raise those in another PR?

[ahrtr]

@ahrtr there exist valid e2e tests in this PR, do we want to take those up in another PR? I'll close this one and raise those in another PR?

either reusing this PR or raising a new PR works for me, it's up to you. thx