Skip to content

Migrate wedge_qsfp_util to use utils::createQsfpServiceClient #416

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

paulcruz74
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:
This change is in order to test a hypothesis that some difference in client
creation between QsfpClient.cpp and ThriftServiceClient.cpp is responsible for
additional latency when executing thrift requests in an OSS context.

Differential Revision: D73670141

Summary:
This change is in order to test a hypothesis that some difference in client
creation between QsfpClient.cpp and ThriftServiceClient.cpp is responsible for
additional latency when executing thrift requests in an OSS context.

Differential Revision: D73670141
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73670141

paulcruz74 added a commit to paulcruz74/fboss that referenced this pull request May 1, 2025
…ok#416)

Summary:

This change is in order to test a hypothesis that some difference in client
creation between QsfpClient.cpp and ThriftServiceClient.cpp is responsible for
additional latency when executing thrift requests in an OSS context.

Differential Revision: D73670141
paulcruz74 added a commit to paulcruz74/fboss that referenced this pull request May 1, 2025
…ok#416)

Summary:

This change is in order to test a hypothesis that some difference in client
creation between QsfpClient.cpp and ThriftServiceClient.cpp is responsible for
additional latency when executing thrift requests in an OSS context.

Differential Revision: D73670141
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants