Skip to content

feat(output): display git scanning results #1616

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

hogo6002
Copy link
Contributor

@hogo6002 hogo6002 commented Feb 12, 2025

Resolves #1577
image

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 12, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 68.75000% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.80%. Comparing base (3d964a5) to head (64c1908).
Report is 93 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
internal/output/output_result.go 62.50% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
internal/output/table.go 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
internal/utility/results/results.go 83.33% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1616   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   68.80%   68.80%           
=======================================
  Files         200      200           
  Lines       18990    19003   +13     
=======================================
+ Hits        13066    13075    +9     
- Misses       5229     5232    +3     
- Partials      695      696    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@hogo6002 hogo6002 requested a review from another-rex February 18, 2025 04:18
@another-rex another-rex merged commit 061cd70 into google:main Feb 19, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support git scanning results, currently shows completely blank line
3 participants