Skip to content

Guided Remediation: Add computation for all relaxation patches #766

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

michaelkedar
Copy link
Member

Following on from #765, adds ComputeRelaxPatches for generating the possible remediation options after a relock.
Also added a new(ish) cache for OSV API requests, which speeds up the above quite a bit.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (251b676) 79.72% compared to head (e2e2b58) 79.72%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #766   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.72%   79.72%           
=======================================
  Files          89       89           
  Lines        6145     6145           
=======================================
  Hits         4899     4899           
  Misses       1043     1043           
  Partials      203      203           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@michaelkedar michaelkedar merged commit 4528ca2 into google:main Jan 29, 2024
michaelkedar added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2024
Implementing
#766 (comment)
- Created `VulnerabilityClient` interface for OSV queries & to store
cache
- Renamed `ResolutionClient` to `DependencyClient`
- Made new `ResolutionClient` struct, that's just both
`DependencyClient` and `VulnerabilityClient` together
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants