Skip to content

Add ICA transfer test to interchain-security tests #3493

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 22, 2023
Merged

Add ICA transfer test to interchain-security tests #3493

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 22, 2023

Conversation

ljoss17
Copy link
Contributor

@ljoss17 ljoss17 commented Jul 21, 2023

Closes: #XXX

Description

This PR adds a test for a transfer using an ICA channel with Provider / Consumer chains

PR author checklist:

  • Added changelog entry, using unclog.
  • Added tests: integration (for Hermes) or unit/mock tests (for modules).
  • Linked to GitHub issue.
  • Updated code comments and documentation (e.g., docs/).
  • Tagged one reviewer who will be the one responsible for shepherding this PR.

Reviewer checklist:

  • Reviewed Files changed in the GitHub PR explorer.
  • Manually tested (in case integration/unit/mock tests are absent).

@ljoss17 ljoss17 added O: tests Objective: Test more aspect of the relayer O: interchain-security Objective: related to Interchain Security labels Jul 21, 2023
@ljoss17 ljoss17 requested a review from romac July 21, 2023 13:13
@romac romac merged commit 83e42c4 into master Jul 22, 2023
@romac romac deleted the luca_joss/ica-transfer-test-for-interchain-security branch July 22, 2023 08:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@romac romac romac approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
O: interchain-security Objective: related to Interchain Security O: tests Objective: Test more aspect of the relayer
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@ljoss17 @romac